ATTENTION: Lilliana Mason has submitted a request to have the StonyBrook Univ. Survey RE-posted as the inherent bugs have been tended to. She would appreciate it if you took the survey found at this link; http://ms.cc.sunysb.edu/~lhuddy/pidsurvey_4.htm

..Although my memory is fading, I remember two things very clearly; I am a great sinner, and Christ is a great Savior. --John Newton

I'd rather be a Conservative Nut-Job, than a Liberal with No nuts and No job. --T-Shirt Logo

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. --C.S. Lewis

Friday, May 9, 2008

Myanmar: Is A U.N. Invasion Possible?

Is this now a realistic possibility brewing over Myanmar? Based on the possibility of undergoing an almost self-imposed Genocide under the Junta? With tens of thousands already dead, and many more deaths predicted, could we possibly see the international community demand the U.N. act through a forced incursion for humanitarian sake?

I DO believe this can become a reality, though a hard fought reality. I have little faith in anything positive emerging from the U.N. But on a disaster of this magnitude, it just may be possible.

In my previous article I mentioned some comments made by Mrs. Bush during her press conference on the situation in Myanmar. While announcing the aide made available, she had scolded the Junta for being inept. But also for failing to warn the populace of the impending storm. She had also derided them over continuing to push forward with their sham of a constitutional referendum despite the disaster that had struck.

From the way things are being played out there in Myanmar, I don't believe the two are a coincidence. It looks to me as if the failure to warn the people could have been intentional. The Junta are extremely paranoid, and suspicious of the outside world. Coupled with their fear of a nation-wide uprising, I could see why they would withhold warnings. More dead means a smaller possibility of an uprising by the populace. And with such devastation at hand, even less people available to challenge their so-called "referendum."

Sound far fetched? Let's now add to the mix, that the Junta has begun seizing the humanitarian aide that has made it into the country. Tony Branbury of the World Food Program has said that, "there's enough food sitting on the tarmac there in Myanmar to feed 95,000 people for a couple days. It's going nowhere." Furthermore, additional incoming aide is now being denied entry into the country.

The U.N. is already stated that it's outraged over the recent developments there in Myanmar. It has said that this is exactly what it had feared may happen without U.N. aide disaster teams being allowed to accompany the shipments.

All of this leads me to believe that eventually, the international community just might begin to demand that the U.N. take some form of action. By force if necessary, simply on the humanitarian basis to prevent a genocidal environment from deteriorating further.

Whilst I was scribbling out my notes at work prepping for this article, I brought this issue up with several co-workers. Mind you I work in a very liberal environment, and even professed Liberals were adamant that action be taken to secure the lives of the populace of Myanmar.

Perhaps this isn't so far-fetched a possibility after all....

2 comments:

Jake Collette said...

Its a danmed if you do danmed if you dont situation for sure. The U.N. helping means one thing though, lets get the U.S. to back this thing up financially while we continue to scorn them with every possible chance. The U.N. is corrupt and is nothing but a blight to America. We should get out.

John said...

Heyas Jake,

Thx for commenting. Yeah, I agree. The UN has been an uber-failure of epic proportions for some time now. We really should bail on it.

I'll also add a comment from digg user Loneranger85, made on digg;

"Burma is a member of the UN. ALL the corrupt, brutal, repressive regimes in the world are members of the UN. So, to answer your question, NO. The UN is a toothless organization of criminals and there is no way they will turn on one of their own."

Too which I agreed, with;

"Yeah, like I said, possibility..., not probability."

Thx again for commenting Jake.

John