Global Warming Dissension Is Growing: Thankfully

When you have a guy that's been dealing with the weather for about 50 years or more like John Coleman has, you'd think he might know what he's talking about. One kind of should, lend him some credence of having a decent idea of how and why the weather does what it does. If he thinks Global Warming is a scam, then the odds are pretty good that it is. Or should at least be looked into a little deeper before assigning "consensus" to it.

Dissension against global whining, is nothing new. Even Penn & Teller generated considerable laughs, (1.5 million views so far,) at enviro-nazi's expense over alarmism. I personally think the GW scare was dreamed up as a pure money-making scheme. When you consider that "The Goreacle" set up the company that buys Carbon offsets..... ???

So, he is essentially paying himself, to globe trot around in a private jet? Reaping rewards for leaving gas-guzzling enviro-killing SUV's idling for extended lengths of time with the AC blasting? While he heads inside to give a speech AGAINST such actions? And live in a mansion in like Tennessee or some such, that uses 20 times a normal homes energy?

As the article on the National Post says; Do as AL says, not as AL does.

Then there was the petition circulating the net with about 30k+ signatures of scientists arguing against GW directly, or calling for more open debate, as they hadn't bought into the "consensus" ideal. I heard some fantastically absurd arguments about what they weren't. Namely, climate scientists. Wrong. As taken from ClimateChangeFraud.com, "..31,000 U.S. scientists - 9,000 with doctorate degrees in atmospheric science, climatology, Earth science, environment and other specialties.." Sounds like a few more than the handful of enviro's at the IPCC.

Now you have a couple of forecasters who originally claimed GW would begin causing devastating super storm category hurricanes, REVERSING their views. Found on the Heartland Institute site, "Global warming is likely to reduce the number of hurricanes that occur each year, according to two new studies by forecasters who previously claimed global warming would cause more hurricanes."

Toss into this dissension mix, Dr David Evans. Dr Evans, as described in this TheAustralian article, "was a consultant to the Australian Greenhouse Office from 1999 to 2005." In his own words, Dr Evans stated, "I am the rocket scientist who wrote the carbon accounting model (FullCAM) that measures Australia's compliance with the Kyoto Protocol.." Dr Evans wraps up his article by saying, "The Australian public is eventually going to have to be told the evidence anyway, so it might as well be told before wrecking the economy."

My sentiments exactly Dr Evans. It would just be nice if the populace here in America was granted that same type of opportunity.