Michael Bloomberg's New York Throne: A Third Term Dictatorship?

Okay, let's hear it you tyranny minded liberal nub-tards. Just try and say we aren't headed for the inevitable Socialistic utopia you've been dreaming of for ages. Marx would be proud of your efforts. Your cohorts have now completely subverted the will of the people, and opened the door to one-person rule.

Thanks a whole hell of a lot for that!

I'm really starting to feel the seething ire of Americans begin to boil over. And I think the rebellions onset may start in New York. The City Council there in New York City has decided to repeal, overturn if you will, the existing TWO-TERM-Limit law. William Warren on ALG's site, has done up an article about this which can be found HERE. And as he so eloquently notes, "This was predominately and most obviously done so that Mayor Michael Bloomberg can seek and serve a third term. Well, hail Caesar!"

Hail Caesar is right. There have already been two public referendums on this subject. One in 1993, and another in 1996. Both of which resulted in the populace in New York saying TWO TERMS are the limit. How much more clarity is required to make the point stick? And as Warren points out in Chapter 50 of the New York City Charter; “No person shall be eligible to be elected to or serve in the office of mayor, public advocate, comptroller, borough president or council member if that person had previously held such office for two or more full consecutive terms so that elected representatives are ‘citizen representatives’ who are responsive to the needs of the people and are not career politicians."

Is that clear enough?

Apparently not clear enough for the 29 idiots that approved of the new royal edict. So which state shall be next I wonder? Pop over to Warren's article to see what 89% of New Yorkers recently had to say about term limits. Can you hear the torches being lit now too?