I... Am.... Utterly.... Shocked.....! NOT! The RAND Corporation's new study links sexual content on television to the increase in teen pregnancies. Wow, never would have seen that one coming. OF COURSE IT'S LINKED! You'd have to be an idiot, or a liberal, to NOT see the connection. Glad to see the brains of the world are finally catching up to what the rest of us already knew. For an encore, I suppose it will be revealed that water, is in fact, wet.
If anything, I think the more surprising part of this story is, that it aired on CNN. Someones about to lose their job, me thinks. But sure enough it was on this morning, on this mornings Morning Express with Robin Meade. And the article is even being carried there on the CNN site. How weird is that? Bah! It must just be CNN trying to put on a balanced face. They must get tired of being called "the video version of the New York Times," so they have to shake it up a bit.
So here's the gist; The RAND Corp. conducted a study of around 2,000 adolescents ages 12 to 17 from 2001 to 2004. They put together a research group, looking over 23 various shows for any sexual content. They then asked those kids how often they viewed each of the reviewed programs. They then came up with a score based on the teens exposure to those shows. The overall report was narrowed down to about 700 of the participants, who were "getting it on" by the time the third survey had come around.
A few key points from the CNN article; "A central message from the study is that there needs to be more dialogue about sex in the media, particularly among parents and their children, said Anita Chandra, the study's lead author and a behavioral scientist at RAND." Yeah, like it's there, it's overwhelming to most of todays kids who are NOT mature enough for the content being shown them.
"We know that if a child is watching more than an hour of TV a day, we know there's a sexual scene in [the] content every 10 minutes, then they're getting a fair amount of sexual content," Chandra said. Hey, free love right? Isn't that what the left is all about? The normalization of the single mom? They, and Planned Genocide should be thrilled.
Even when accounting for other related factors such as demographics and risk-taking behaviors, the correlation between televised sexual content and teen pregnancy persisted, she said. The study also found that adolescents living in a two-parent household had a lower probability of pregnancy. Ya don't say? You hear that deadbeats dad's (and in some cases, mom's) of America? Get your a$$ in gear and own up to what you've contributed to.
Previous RAND research also showed that teens who watch a lot of television with sexual content are more likely to initiate intercourse the following year. I'm thinking the old adage, even if rather childish, of "monkey see, monkey do" fits well here.
The National Institutes of Health reported in July that teen pregnancies rose in the United States from 2005 to 2006 for the first time since 1991. Hmmm.. What year did Planned Genocide start handing out condoms in school?
Anyways, the CNN article has some good info on this topic. I recommend at least a skimming of their article.
UPDATE: 1-2-2008; For those who may be wondering, yes you are correct, I haven't written anything new for a few days. I have been pondering, and decided to go through with, going on a writting sabatical for a few months. With all the political mess we are in now, and all the crap we've been put through over the last year and a half, I need the rest, just as America needs a rest from liberals. I'll c yas on the flip side. --John
Now here is a serious YouTube Brutha with Word! Alfonzo, also known as "machosauceproductions" puts the serious smack down, and is worthy of note. You can check him out here; http://www.youtube.com/user/machosauceproduction
..Although my memory is fading, I remember two things very clearly; I am a great sinner, and Christ is a great Savior. --John Newton
"A Veteran -- whether active duty, discharged, retired, or reserve -- is someone who at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to: 'The United States of America,' for an amount of 'up to, and including his life.'" --Unknown









6 comments:
Don't be silly. The research did not show causation. It's like saying watching football causes people to drink beer.
Something tells me this still won't inspire HBO to produce a show called "Abstinence in the City".
Read the article - they had to correct for overall TV viewing to even get the correlation's significance. CORRELATION is not CAUSATION!
Sorry, pet peeve :).
I think it's more likely something else is causing both - more interest/free time to watch TV and have sex.
Tony and Christie,
I'll remember to pass on those thoughts to Ludacriss, who reminds those young kids that they "Can't be tied down to one woman."
Do I need to be any more specific than that? Or are you catching on yet?
John
I'm not saying that they DON'T get bad images/values/etc portrayed to them in the cultural sphere (though, is Ludacris TV?). I'm just saying that you can't read these results to say that sex on TV causes pregnancy. That's bad science. They didn't manipulate the amount of TV watched and show how it caused pregnancy - they just correlated the two. It's possible that rap music causes watching more TV programs with a lot of sex and higher pregnancy rates, as your quote suggests. Unless you have some form of controlled experiment you can't imply causation, only that the two are related.
Christie,
Here's the RAND News Release itself on the Topic;
http://www.rand.org/news/press/2008/11/03/
And here is the RAND Research Brief on the Topic;
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9398/index1.html
I'm not finding the correlation / causation argument you bring up. I did however, find that they have conducted previous research on the subject, which enforces the above discovered results. You can view some about that here;
http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9068/index1.html
"Guesstimated correlation" is not a factor in either.
John
Post a Comment