CNN's Latest Putz: Jane Velez Mitchell And Her "War On Women" Issue

You know, I've never been one to advocate any form of violence against women. Period. I find it appalling. It's pathetic. And I personally think those posing to be men, who exert force against women should receive the same treatment they inflicted on women, as part of their own punishment. But I will say this. This new Femi-Nazi that CNN gave airtime to, in place of Glenn Beck, needs to go. Jane Valez Mitchell truly does have ISSUES, but it appears to only be mental issues she needs to cope with. And I seriously doubt anything less than some overt act of violence will do the trick at putting her head on straight. Yes, it's sad to think of it that way. But the incompetent fervor that Mitchell injects into her hour long rant-o-vision broadcasts, is nothing less than an embarrassment to all journalists. She either needs to get her a$$ squared away, or be shipped out. Perhaps she can go back to covering local news somewhere, like in the Himalayas. It would be nice if the change could be brought upon without something horrible happening. But the odds are against it, especially when dealing with the liberal mentality she exudes.

Take for instance, her latest femi-rage she's been on. The "War Against Women." As she describes it so un-eloquently, all men are scum. All men are monsters of one form or another. And they are all out to do harm, specifically to women. This is wroooong, in just so many ways I shan't bother to even list them. One particular item she's been stuck on in this particular realm, is the case of missing New York girl, Laura Garza. Garza went missing a couple weeks ago, and the prime suspect is a complete loser, Level-1 sex offender, Michael Mele. If you get a chance to see a pic of Garza, she is a pretty cute girl. I'm sorry to hear she's still missing. I'm sure she was a real sweetheart, and I actually mean that. But most likely, she is dead. I hope not, but it's probably true. Mitchell ranted and raved about how despicable this guy Mele was, and has had plenty of guests on to echo her sentiments. But yet, right before going off about this missing girl Garza, she was all up in arms about how we need MORE gun control! More gun control. We've got to disarm the populace, (namely men) because guns and men automatically equal violence against women.

Sigh....

Does anyone else here see a problem?

Let's review, Jane, before you manage to somehow, make yourself look worse than you already do. You sit there, spewing your standardized, teleprompted liberal mantra about more gun control, which we all know doesn't work for crap. And then you jump into the fire, head first, about a New York City woman going missing, most likely by this Mele guy. Hellllooooooooo Jane! New York City just happens to have the same BullS#!t no gun, Washington D.C. style restrictions. Now, had Garza possibly had the appropriate tool for the situation, also known as a GUN, would Garza still be missing? Possibly, but not as likely. And don't even try to feed the world that crap about 'the gun would just get used against her, and she'd end up dead.' Hey you bleeding heart idiot! She's ALREADY freaking missing! If Garza would have had immediate access to a firearm, she would have had at least a 50-50 chance of fighting back, possibly emptying a magazine into the tard that sent her missing (likely Mele), or going missing anyways. Give her a fighting chance you femi-stooge! Odds are, Garza would not be missing right now, and there most likely wouldn't be a trial required for this sex-prior loser Mele, as he would probably be dead.

Well, look at that will you. The girl comes out safe (possibly) in the end, and the bad guy is dead. And even better, the state doesn't have to dig deeper into the taxpayers pocket to pay for his decades long storage and upkeep. Just a hole in the ground.

In retrospect, get Mitchell off the air CNN, before she manages to say something even more inane than she has spouted thus far. YOUR reputation is depending on it.