"Okay, so why is the avenue of bankruptcy better for the auto industry, rather than a bailout? Enlighten me oh Hoopy one. Yes, bless me with the knowledge that only you seem to have." For those that haven't figured it out, that was written from the perspective of just one of the many lib-tards I must deal with on a daily basis. And it would appear our own President has been affected by this disease, commonly referred to as Liberalism.
But, as requested, here it is. The primary reason why the auto industry needs to go bankrupt, rather than get a taxpayer funded handout, as provided by GetLiberty.org.
This is 22 pounds of pure, unadulterated and documented stupidity. Also known as Ford’s 2,215 page 2007 master contract with the UAW. GM and Chrysler's contracts fair little better.
Think I'm kidding you? Okay, than how about you go look them up YOURSELF. Yeah, I have the links right here "bail-out'ers," thanks to J. Justin Wilson of LaborPains.org.
Ford’s 2007 Contract:
"Well, that's just Ford. GM and Chrysler aren't that bad," so says the libby's. Interesting you should bring that up. If Ford's is this bad, then WHY is Ford fairing better than Chrysler and GM with their 'not that bad' contracts? Just to quell those reason for a bail-out delusions your having, here's their contracts too;
GM’s 2003 and 2007 contracts:
Changes to GM’s 2007 contract (HT: Factory Rats; full contract not available) They won't even allow their new contracts out.
Chrysler’s 2003 and 2007 contracts:
Changes to Chrysler’s 2007 contract (HT: Factory Rats; full contract not available) Ditto here. I'm willing to bet, that given another round of 'negotiations,' Ford's would be unavailable as well.
'nuff said? I think so. No, no, please. No need to start bowing and praising. Just doing what comes naturally here.
0 comments:
Post a Comment